. .

Welcome to James Craven's Blog

I've recently created this page with the intent of helping my fellow marketer. Over the past months I've written dozens upon dozens of articles that I've either posted on enzines, or just kept stuffed away in my desk. Well I figure it's time to put them to some use. So I've gathered them up along with some e-books, free software and a few other goodies. I love to write, so if there is anything you would like to hear my opinion about or basic fact, please let me know and I will get right on it. I am just a normal guy with just a little extra time on my hands. The internet has set me free financially and if you would trust in me I will take your hand and guide you down the path to prosperity. Why do you ask? Because in order to succeed in this business we must all help one another, otherwise it will not work. That is my belief and I trust in it. Sincerely, James Craven

Saturday, March 21, 2009

Split Testing to Improve Your Website

Most people change their website's pages whenever they get a new idea. They think that each change is going to improve their site and make them more successful.

Of course, there are basic improvements you can make as you are writing the content for your site. And for the first few weeks you may notice some shortcomings that need to be remedied.

But, after a few days or weeks your site becomes stable. You don't find any more errors in spelling or grammar. The graphics look like they belong on the site. And your order link or opt-in form performs correctly.

You're now ready for split testing. This is a slow, incremental improvement of your site through ongoing testing.

Split testing involves making an experimental change to one of your pages, measuring the effects of that change, and analyzing the significance of differences in measured results. In other words, a split test attempts to determine how a change to your site affects some measurable response.

There are several decisions you must make to conduct a split test.

First, you need to determine what change you want to make. Typically you will change a headline, a sentence or two in your sales copy, the price of your product, the wording of your guarantee, change an image, or alter some other single feature of your page.

You will use two (or more) nearly identical pages. The difference being that one page has the "original" material while the other "experimental" page has the change applied.

Second, you must decide what "success event" to measure. For many people, it will be sales of a product or clicks of the order link. Some will want to measure the number of opt-ins. Others will measure the clicks to a pay-per-click service like AdSense.

To measure successfully, you must know how to distinguish successful responses from your "original" and "experimental" pages.

For example, many affiliate programs allow you to include a campaign ID in your link. By placing one campaign ID in the order links on the "original" page and another campaign ID on the "experimental" page you can determine the number of clicks and the number of orders coming from your pages.

Other people use a redirect script that keeps statistics on each redirect request. Redirect scripts typically use a keyword to select the URL for redirection. You can use keywords like "original" and "experimental" and have both redirected to your affiliate program's order page. Then you can use the admin function of the redirect script to look at the number of clicks to the order page from both your "original" and "experimental" pages.

Next, you'll need a script to randomly deliver your original or experimental pages to your site's visitors. It would be helpful for this script to place a cookie on the visitor’s computer so the same page is delivered when the visitor returns.

Finally, you'll need to analyze the results. The Chi Square statistic is often used to determine the significance of experiments similar to this. While differences in results often seem satisfyingly clear, they often are not statistically significant.

For example, consider two pages that are each displayed 500 times. One page resulted in 20 sales while the other page resulted in 30 sales. "WOW", you say. "One page caused 50% more sales than the other page. That's got to be meaningful."

In this case we had a total of 50 sales, all things being equal, we would expect 25 sales from each page. The difference for both of your pages was only 5 sales. One page made 5 more sales than expected while the other made 5 fewer sales than expected. This could easily be the result of random variation rather than being caused by differences in your pages.

To help you understand, consider this story. Two random people are each given 500 pennies and each is placed 30 feet from a small can. They toss their pennies at the can. One person gets 30 pennies in the can while the other gets only 20 in the can. Can you conclude that the person who got 30 pennies in was significantly more skilled at tossing pennies than the other person?

No. In fact, if this penny tossing experiment was repeated 100 times, it is likely that 15 of those results would differ by as much or more than our example. That's too close to simple random variation to believe that there is a real difference in skill levels between the people tossing the pennies.

For many experiments, a "statistically significant" result means that the differences we seen in our result would occur 5 or fewer times if a similar random experiment was repeated 100 times.

So, we should not conclude that there is a significant difference in the ability of our pages to deliver the "success event."

There are now two things we can do. One is to conclude that the change we made to our "experimental" page is not statistically significant. In this case we can move on to the next split test experiment.

Or, we can continue this split test and hope that the ratio of sales remains the same. If we carried on the split test longer and found the same ratio of results, the differences could be significant. Consider doubling the number of exposures of your pages. If the ratio held, and we now have 60 sales compared to only 40 sales, that result would be statistically significant.

In 100 truly random experiments, successes having differences similar to 60 and 40 would occur fewer than 5 times. This is a good indication that the observed differences were not caused simply by random chance. Rather, we can conclude that there was a real cause for the observed differences.

The Chi Square statistic can be found on many spreadsheets, including Excel. With this statistic you compare the expected success values with the actual success values. When the statistic has a value of 0.05 or less you can conclude that there was a real reason for the differences.

Don't expect every split test experiment to yield important results. Perhaps a third of your split test experiments will show the experimental page significantly improved sales. A third of the time there will be no significant difference. And a third of the time, the experimental page will cause a decrease in sales.

But, keep testing because that's the sure way to improve your sales.

2 comments:

  1. Everything I've heard about split testing has convinced me it's a really great thing to do. Once I'm at that stage of course. The question I have is what about someone like me who really doesn't understand how to set it up and monitor it. Are there people you can contract out to do this? Who would they be and do you know typically how much it would cost to hire them?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Firstly I will show you the simple steps you can follow to do it yourself. If you would rather pay to have it done, I would suggest joining MLM Pro. It is one of the perks of the system, besides all the great training, you could also use the system to promote your primary programs. Here is my link if you would like to give it a trial run at 1 dollar for 2 weeks.
    http://www.LeadsSystemsMLMPro.com
    It would save you money, rather than paying someone to split test for you. You would also gain an edge in training, lead generation and expertise over your competition.

    Here is the basics if you would like to do it yourself. I'll go through it like I'm doing it myself. Hopefully this will make it easier for you to understand.
    1. Go to Google Website Optimizer.
    2. Click the “Great Experiment” link.
    3. You would want to test only a particular section of the theme. An A/B split test is meant to test entirely separate pages against each other. That doesn’t fit this situation. So, we’ll create a multivariate experiment.
    4. The next will give you an overview of the process. At this point, you need to come up with what your test is going to be. In my case, I am going to test the banner section on my JamesCraven.biz homepage which advertises the Cravens Collective Newsletter. The goal page will be the free signup sales letter. With that in mind, check “I’ve completed the steps above and I’m ready to start setting up my experiment.” and continue.
    5. Assign a name to the experiment (whatever makes sense for you). The test page URL is where all the testing happens (in my case, the JamesCraven.biz homepage). The conversion page is the place where you’re trying to get people to go to (in my case, the free signup salesletter). Hit continue.
    6. On Step 2 of the process, you’ll select whether you have people setting this up for you or whether you’re doing it yourself. Choose the option for doing it yourself.
    7. On the next step, you will get a few snippets of javascript code that need to be included in your test page and conversion page. Ideally, these snippets will go within the HTML header and before the closing HTML tags, but in my experience it is OK to have the control script simply above the testing region, the tracking script below it, etc. In my case, I included the control script into my home.php file right underneath the call to get_header() and the tracking script right before the call to get_footer(). You will have Google validate the pages once you’ve done it and it will tell you if what you’ve done is correct.
    8. On the next step, you will set up your variations. It will automatically detect your existing section as your “original”. In my case, I kept the original in place (obviously) and created a new variation to provide a test. When you create a new variation, the original will be pre-filled. Make the changes you want to test and save. I recommend you use only 2-3 variations so as to not introduce too much into your first split test.
    9. On the last step, you will review the specs of your test and launch. You can preview your page using the test variations to make sure it works OK. Use the “Preview This Experiment Now” link to do so.
    10. Press the Launch button. Your split test is now live.

    ReplyDelete